Welcome

Welcome to Quickinfo where you get it all, If you want to Advertise with us, Buy 90million Nigeria GSM Numbers For your adverts, Bulk SMS, Email Addresses (worldwide), etc. contact us via e-mail: quicknews@ymail.com
Showing posts with label Subsidy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Subsidy. Show all posts

Wednesday, 25 April 2012

N1.07t subsidy: Ahmadu Ali, others to face trial

By
Ahmadu Ali,  
 Ahmadu Ali,
-NNPC told to refund N310b -House clears Synopsis, Zenon -New chance for 17 firms

FORMER Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPPRA) chairman and executive secretaries (2009-2011) were told yesterday  to get set for trial over the N1.07 trillion subsidy scandal. 
They will be investigated/prosecuted by anti-corruption agencies, the House of Representatives said. 
Former Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Chairman Ahmadu Ali was the agency’s chairman during the period. The former PPPRA executive secretaries are: Mr. A Ibikunle (August 2009 to February 2011) and Mr. Goddy Egbuji (February 2011 to August 2011).
The House also said the Auditor-General of the Federation should audit the account of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) to ascertain its solvency and report back to the House Committee on Public Accounts within three months. 
Also approved is the refund of the 2011 subsidy funds collected by the NNPC. This was in spite of a letter by the corporation to the House leadership, stating that the funds were meant to offset backlogs of 2010. 
In all, 35 of the 62 recommendations of the Farouk Lawan-headed House Committee on Fuel Subsidy regime were accepted. 
Recommendation (xiii) as adopted states: “That the Executive secretaries of the Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPPRA) who were the accounting officers, and under whose watch those abuses were perpetrated that led to the government losing billions of naira should be held liable. Therefore, we strongly recommend that those who served as Executive secretaries of Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Authority (PPPRA) from January 2009 to October 2011 should be further investigated/prosecuted by relevant anti-corruption agencies. This should also include GM Field Services, ACDO/Supervisor-Ullage Team 1, and ACDO Supervisor-Ullage Team 2 within the same period, for their roles in the management of the Ullaging under the subsidy scheme. 
The amended recommendation (xvi) reads:  “That the chairman of the Board of the Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPPRA) from 2009-2011 and the entire members of the board during the period should be investigated and prosecuted and their decision which opened a floodgate for the bazaar is condemned in the strongest form.” 
Other recommendations adopted by the House are as follows: (xi); ”That the relevant anti-corruption agencies should carry out the due diligence investigation to determine the total demurrage payment and outstanding incurred by Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) for the period 2009-2011.
(xii) “That under the Petroleum Support Fund (PSF) scheme, importers, especially Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), should be mandated to patronise Nigerian flagged vessels, provided they produce the standard safety and sea-worthiness certificates in tune with international best practice. 
(xiii) that all payments which the Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPPRA) made to itself from the Petroleum Support Fund (PSF) account in excess of the approved administrative charges which were due to it under the Template should be recovered and paid back into the fund. The officials involved in the infraction should be further investigated/prosecuted by the relevant anti-corruption agencies. These confirmed illegal payments were N156.455 billion in 2009 and N155.824 billion in 2010, a total sum of N312. 279 billion. 
Speaker Aminu Tambuwal warned that there are no sacred cows in the oil sector that is too big for the law to deal with. 
Tambuwal, who spoke just before the House went into the committee of the Whole to consider the report, hoped the executive would implement the report as adopted by the House. 
But, 17 oil marketers got a reprieve.
They were given two weeks to appear before the panel to state their positions on various allegations levelled against them. 
The companies are: Mut-Has Petroleum Ltd, Nepal Oil and Gas Service, Oilbath Nigeria, Techno Oil Ltd, Somerset Energy Services, Stonebridge Oil Ltd, Mobil Oil Nigeria, AX Energy Limited, CAH Resources Association Limited, Crust Energy Limited, Fresh Synergy Limited and Ibafon Oil Limited. 
Others are: Lottoj Oil and Gas Limited, Oakfield Synergy Network Limited, Petro Trade Energy Limited, Prudent Energy & Service Limited and Rocky Energy Limited. 
Before the new lease of life granted the oil companies, they were asked to refund N41.9 billion to government coffers. 
Two firms – Zenon Petroleum & Gas Limited and Synopsis Enterprises Limited were exonerated by Lawan, who told the House the companies were listed in error.
According to him, both firms should not have been on the list of those who partook in forex.
They did not participate in the PSF, Farouk told the House.
House spokesman Zakari Mohammed while speaking with reporters yesterday on the issue said: 
“The truth of the matter is that we want to give them a fair hearing. We don’t want a situation where they‘ll take us to court. People shouldn’t take us to court for this kind of row; we should avoid it. 
“If 17 companies say they were not invited or they did not get invited, or that we did not exhaust our legislative processes, the onus lies on us to give them fair hearing so that nobody rubbishes this report in the court of law. 
“But in the court of people’s opinion, people know that these 17 companies are being economical with the truth. At the same time, we are giving them two weeks to come up and defend themselves. 
“As far as we’re concerned, it does not change the decimal. It is still as constant as ever. The only thing is that we just want to avoid any avoidable pitfall. In two weeks, those two companies will be invited, and whatever the findings are like, it will come out as a supplementary report.” 
The road to a new lease of life for the oil company began when half way into the deliberations, a member, Osai Osai,  noted that it was imperative to give them an opportunity to present their cases to the House. 
Tobi Ukechukwu (PDP Enugu) moved a motion that the 17 companies be allowed to present their case. 
The House told the Executive that there should be no sacred cows that cannot be touched by the long arms of the law and that the Executive should fish out all those indicted by the committee. 
It, however, added another resolution - that NNPC should refund the subsidy deduction made for fuel subsidy in 2011. The members based their decision on the fact that the committee had said in its report that the 445, 000 bpd that the NNPC receives is more than sufficient for the country and that there is no need for subsidy. 
In insisting that the NNPC should refund the deductions, the House pointed out that the report shows that the NNPC has been deducting far beyond what the PPPRA recommended and thus should refund the deductions. 
The House was filled to capacity yesterday as it deliberated on the report and adopted most of the recommendations , The Deputy Speaker said that the NNPC sent a letter to the House, stating its position, Farouk was asked to comment 
According to Farouk, the letter states that the deductions made in 2011 for subsidy payments were for subsidy payments meant for 2010. 
Tambuwal, in a speech which won him a standing ovation, praised the committee’s members “for their courage, dedication and professionalism. They were given a crucial assignment and they handled it with the integrity and patriotism it deserved.” 
He declared that the oil sector as not “a secret society” nor “a sacred cow”.
The Speaker said the probe raised so much dust from certain segments of the polity “such that it became clear that the intention was to frustrate it”. 
His words: “For those who regard the oil sector as a secret society or sacred cow, I wish to state without equivocation that it is not. All public agencies in the oil sector are the creation of Acts of the National Assembly and this Honourable House has no powers to legislate for the creation of secret societies. 
“Similarly, all private sector corporate bodies operating in the sector are the creation of the Corporate Affairs Commission and that Commission also is not vested with any powers to incorporate secret societies. Let it, therefore, be known that in our drive to sanitise the polity, there are no sacred cows and we do not intend to discover any.” 
The Speaker urged members to “to look at the report dispassionately”. He went on: “Nigerians are watching us very closely and history will judge what we do here today. 
“Be fair in your comments and let aside all primordial sentiments so that we can do justice to this important document. 
“Let me also remind you that we are fighting against entrenched interests whose infectious greed has decimated our people. Therefore, be mindful that they will fight back, and they do fight dirty. 
“I have heard all kinds of insinuations, including the one about anti-graft agencies waiting for a ‘harmonised version’ of this report before taking any action. Let me quickly say here that this is at best an excuse that can not stand. After all, the same agencies accept and investigate petitions from individuals; how much more resolutions of this House, 
“There will be no such document. So, they should just go ahead and do their job and where they find any person or body culpable, they should proceed in accordance with the law. 
“Our only interest here is to mitigate the suffering of Nigerians by showing how the subsidy regime has been hijacked for the benefit of a few. 
“At the end of our deliberations we hope that the executive arm will act upon the resolutions of this House and bring more transparency to bear on the system.” 
Of the 62 recommendations in the report, members considered 35 yesterday. The consideration of the report continues today. 

Tuesday, 17 April 2012

69 oil marketers to refund N241.247b petrol subsidy

By
Hon Lawan  
Hon Lawan
Stakeholders seek probe from 1999
The House of Representatives Ad hoc Committee on Fuel Subsidy has asked 69 oil marketers to refund N241.247billion.
Besides the illegal cash they got last year, 46 companies did not pay taxes, according to the Federal Inland Revenue Service.

The committee established that N1.692trillion was paid as subsidy last year.
But stakeholders in the industry, including some oil majors, are insisting that the probe ought to be from 1999 to date.
Besides, the presentation of the report today by the committee has assumed ethnic dimension with a group, the South-South Youth Caucus, accusing the North of plotting to undermine President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration.

The Farouk Lawan-led committee discovered that disqualified subsidy claims by 69 companies amounted to N241.247 billion.

Some of the companies are: Acorn Plc, Alminnur Resources Ltd, AMG Petro-Energy Ltd, Anosyke Group of companies Ltd, Ascon Oil & Gas Company, Avant Garde Energy, A-Z Petroleum, CAH Resources Association Ltd, Conoil Plc, Crust Energy Ltd, Downstream Energy Source Ltd, Dozzy Oil and Gas Ltd, Duport Marine Ltd, Eco-Regen Ltd, Eurafic Oil and Coastal Services Ltd, and First Deep water Discovery Ltd.

Others are: Frado International Ltd, Fresh Synergy Ltd, Heyden Petroleum, Ibafon Oil Ltd, Imad Oil & Gas Ltd, Integrated Resources Ltd, Ipman Investment Ltd, Knightsbridge, Linetrale Oil supply and Trading Company, Lingo Oil & Gas Company Ltd, Lloyds Energy Ltd, Lottoj Oil & Gas Ltd, Maizube Petroleum Ltd, Matrix Energy Oil & Gas Ltd, Menol Oil & Gas Ltd.

The report of the committee reads in part: “Discharges that suffered one or more of the above infractions were adjudged not sustainable and, therefore, not good enough to attract any subsidy. The disqualified claims to subsidy amount to N241.247billion.

“The associated PMS volumes of 3,453,690,070 litres are, therefore, deductible from the annual mass volume, with a view to determining the appropriate volume of consumption.

“These defective transactions should be further investigated by the EFCC to ensure that all those who collected unmerited subsidy are made to refund the amounts collected.”

The committee asked the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation to account for over N213.678billion being excess subsidy payments in 2009 and 2010.

The report added: “The Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation (OAGF) should account for N213.678billion being total of excess payments made by it over and above what the PPPRA identified as paid in 2009 and 2010. The OAGF is not only responsible for the accounts of the Federation, including the Petroleum Subsidy Funds (PSF) and Domestic Crude Account, but refused to provide further details on the account when requested to do so during the public hearing.

“EFCC and ICPC should ensure that the OAGF accounts for the over-recovery figures of NGN 2.766billion and NGN5.27billion.”

The panel faulted alleged conflicting figures from the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC).

It said: “NNPC had two sources of recovery of its subsidy viz: (i) Direct deductions from Domestic Crude receipts accruable to the Federation. (ii) Payment by CBN through deduction from distributable revenues as per the Federation Account Component Statement.
“NNPC, in its submission, claimed to have earned N586 billion as subsidy from the supply of 7,576,726, 157 litres of PMS in 2011.

“However by PPPRA’s presentation, NNPC was paid a subsidy of N667.533billion for supplying 5,470,007,111 litres of PMS.
“By CBN’s presentation, NNPC was paid N844.944billion as subsidy in 2011. In addition to CBN’s payment of N844.944billion as represented on the Federation Account Component Statement, NNPC made a direct deduction of N847.942billion as subsidy in 2011, bringing all claims to N1.692 trillion.”

On the jump in subsidy to N1.6trillion in 2011, the Lawan committee said the PPPRA’s argument that it was due to computed arrears was untenable and illegal.

It said: “PPPRA, in its presentation to the House of Representatives, had hinted that the noticeable upsurge in subsidy payment in 2011 was due not only to increase in subsidy per litre but also due
 to the computed arrears due NNPC for HHK discharges. This was established from NNPC’s submission to be N284.580billion.

“This payment of subsidy arrears on HHK was an illegality, having been proscribed by a presidential directive in 2009. NNPC was stopped from further collecting subsidy on HHK. The corporation abided by the presidential directive but unilaterally reversed the situation without any counter directive or order from the President.”

Following the leakage of the report, some stakeholders in the oil industry met last night in Abuja ahead of its presentation today.
After the session in a posh hotel, one of the stakeholders, who spoke in confidence, said: “For Nigerians to know the truth about fuel subsidy, we are demanding that the House should extend the probe to subsidy payment since 1999 or pre-1999 era.
“That is the only condition the report can be acceptable or credible. They cannot make those who imported fuel from 2009 to 2011 scapegoats. We want fairness for all.
“Nigeria can only clean its oil industry, if there is a comprehensive inquiry into the subsidy management since 1999 or before 1999.”

The Coordinator of the Southsouth Youth Caucus, David Osaro, in a statement last night, said: “The North wants to use the House of Representatives probe to bring down Jonathan’s government.

“It has become very clear that the current House of Representatives probe of the petroleum industry and the deregulation of the downstream sector is nothing but a subtle plot by the North to discredit and ultimately bring down the Jonathan administration.

“It is very evident that in order to achieve their aim, the North quickly cashed in on the fuel subsidy removal issue, and due to its sensitivity, everything was put in place to actualise their plans of truncating this administration. Otherwise, how else do you explain the fact that a probe into the activities of the oil industry should have predated the current administration of Dr. Goodluck Jonathan?

“Even more curious is the fact that similar probes in the past have not yielded anything that the ordinary Nigerian can be proud of, both in terms of findings and implementation of probe reports. Ordinarily, it would have been taken for  granted that the House of Representatives panel may find nothing actually incriminating against the current government of Mr. President but the manner in which the House is going about it truly leaves much to be desired, in terms of its sincerity.

“If tradition is also anything to go by, it may be pertinent to state that the North is trying to use the House of Representatives to achieve its plan of shifting the power equation back to the North. If this were not the case, how then do you rationalise the failure of the House to actually extend the probe to also include the oil industry from 2009 till date?”

Friday, 6 April 2012

Subsidy removal: Nwabueze, Utomi, others 48 sue FG

By Vanguard: Ikechukwu Nnochiri ABUJA — Fifty eminent Nigerians led by  Prof. Ben Nwabueze, have approached a Federal High Court in Abuja, asking it to declare the increase in fuel pump price from N65 to N97 announced by the Federal Government on January 15, as unlawful, null and void.
The plaintiffs named President Goodluck Jonathan, Senate President, Speaker of House of Reps, Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPPRA) and the 36 state governors as co-defendants in the suit.
Other plaintiffs in the suit are Mr Balarabe Musa, Dr Tunji Braithwaite, Kalu Idika Kalu, Prof. Pat Utomi; late Gani Fawehinmi’s wife, Ganiyat; Shehu Sanni, Dr Fredrick Fasheun, among others.
Protesters at Mobolaji Johnson road Ikeja during the peaceful protest, against deployment of soldiers to Lagos state and new price of fuel, by Fed Govt, organised by National Action Coalition of Democracy, in Lagos . Photo; Bunmi Azeez
In their originating summons, the litigants contended that going by provisions of Section 7 of the PPPRA and Section 81 of the 1999 Constitution, the defendants were not empowered to validly increase the pump price of petrol as was done on January 15, 2012 from N65 per litre to N97 per litre.
They stressed that by virtue of Section 81 of the 1999 constitution, the defendants cannot sit as a body or in consultation with one another and validly take any decision affecting the appropriation of revenue accruing to the Federation and, in particular, the removal of subsidy on petrol without a valid appropriation Act.
The Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice Ibrahim Auta, has already assigned the case file to Justice Adamu Bello.
Specifically, the plaintiffs, through their lawyer, Festus Keyamo, are asking the court to declare that  the purported increase of petrol pump price from N65 to N97 by the defendants while sitting as a body or in consultation with one another is in violation of Section 81 of the 1999 Constitution and Section 7 of the PPPRA Act and, therefore, null and void and of no effect.
“To nullify the decision of the defendants increasing the price of petrol from N65 to N97 on the grounds that the defendants’ action contravened Section 81 of the 1999 Constitution  and section 7 of the PPPRA Act.
Besides, they asked the court to direct President Jonathan to immediately reverse the price of petrol from N97 to N65 per litre.
The case has been fixed for mention on May 22.